×

Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

Court case
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 597 U.S. ___, was a United States Supreme Court case related to the ability of state officials to intervene to defend the constitutionality of state laws. Wikipedia
Date decided: 2022
Decision: Opinion
Location: United States
Docket no: 21-248

Mar 21, 2022 · A case in which the Court held that North Carolina legislators have a right to intervene in a lawsuit to defend a state voter-ID law.
Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 23, 2022. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion. SCOTUSblog ...
People also ask
Jun 23, 2022 · BERGER v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE. CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP. Opinion of the Court could not overcome a “heightened presumption” that the. Board ...
The issue: The case involved whether North Carolina legislators may intervene to defend the state's voter identification law in constitutional challenges and ...
Nov 10, 2022 · In that case, the Court considered a motion to intervene as of right in the Secretary of Labor's challenge to the results of a union election.
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the ability of state ...
Jun 23, 2022 · North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 21-248, holding that the speaker of the North Carolina State House of Representatives and the ...
Mar 21, 2022 · Philip Berger (“Berger”) et al., argues North Carolina law allows state legislators (“intervenors”) to intervene to defend the state's vote ID ...
Jul 6, 2022 · In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that two leaders of the North Carolina General Assembly were entitled to intervene as of right under Federal ...
Missing: Conference | Show results with:Conference
Dec 3, 2021 · Plaintiffs filed this suit in district court against Governor Cooper and the members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections alleging ...