Plessy v. Ferguson
Court case
>
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known... Wikipedia
Dates: Apr 13, 1896 – May 18, 1896
Ruling court: Supreme Court of the United States
Location: United States
Decision: Opinion
Dissent: Harlan
Prior: Ex parte Plessy, 11 So. 948 (La. 1892)
Plessy Lawyer
Show more
Show less
People also ask
What happened in Plessy v. Ferguson?
What did Plessy v. Ferguson mean quizlet?
How did Plessy violate this law?
What did "separate but equal" mean?
A case in which the Court held that state-mandated segregation laws did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Feb 8, 2022 · It was held to be a covert attempt on the part of the municipality to make an arbitrary and unjust discrimination against the Chinese race.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. ...
Plessy v. Ferguson | Summary, Ruling, Background, & Impact
www.britannica.com › event › Plessy-v-F...
Mar 1, 2024 · Plessy v. Ferguson was the first major inquiry into the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's (1868) equal-protection clause, which prohibits ...
Oct 29, 2009 · The Plessy v. Ferguson verdict enshrined the doctrine of “separate but equal” as a constitutional justification for segregation, ensuring the ...
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) is the Supreme Court case that had originally upheld the constitutionality of “separate, but equal facilities” based on race.
The Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson ushered in an era of legally sanctioned racial segregation. Above, an African American man stands below a sign ...
Dec 28, 2023 · On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court makes a critical court decision regarding racial segregation in rail cars.
May 19, 2021 · Plessy's claim was about the intention behind the law, that the intention was discriminatory, and that that was exactly the kind of thing that ...
Plessy was found guilty in November of violating the act, and the Citizens Committee appealed. The Supreme Court of Louisiana upheld the decision, and the case ...
Related searches