×

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, 591 U.S. ___, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a state-based scholarship program that provides public funds to ... Wikipedia
Majority: Roberts, joined by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
Jun 30, 2020 · The program grants a tax credit to any- one who donates to certain organizations that in turn award scholarships to selected students attending ...
People also ask
Jan 22, 2020 · The Court's precedents establish that neutral government action is not unconstitutional solely because it fails to benefit religious exercise.
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019. Jun 28 2019, Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Cato Institute GRANTED. Jun 28 2019, Motion for leave ...
On June 30, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided one of the most important education reform cases in the past half-century. This landmark case, Espinoza v.
The outcome: The U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded the Montana Supreme Court's ruling in a 5-4 opinion, holding the application of Article X, Section 6 ...
Summary. This case involves the interaction of the religion clauses of the First Amendment—the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. One key area ...
Jun 30, 2020 · The Court correctly concludes that Montana's no-aid provision expressly discriminates against religion in violation of the Free Exercise Clause.
The application of the no-aid provision discriminated against religious schools and the families whose children attend or hope to attend them in violation of ...
Jul 1, 2020 · The Supreme Court in 2020 ruled that states cannot create programs that exclude religious schools from programs that subsidize private ...
Nov 10, 2020 · The Court's ruling in Espinoza rejects the disjointed, aimless approach that has historically characterized Religion Clauses jurisprudence and ...